Uncategorized

September was marked by the governmental overhaul, which led to the appointment of the permanent minister of culture and strategic communications, and the beginning of the budget process for the upcoming year. The security services added their position to the Telegram regulatory debate, recommending its ban on public officials’ devices. The legislator and the media regulator were largely silent this month despite submitting certain amendments to the Criminal Code: no laws or important regulations were adopted.

European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) is the regulation adopted by the EU in April 2024 to safeguard media pluralism and editorial independence in an environment undergoing rapid digital transformation. Digital Security Lab Ukraine analyzed the norms of Ukrainian legislation, which will require harmonization with the European Media Freedom Act, and prepared recommendations in 10 key spheres that reflect EMFA’s provisions to be implemented prior to EU accession.

In August, Ukraine became one step closer towards the formal EU accession process by designing the constituency of its negotiation groups. The MPs continued debating the issue of platform regulation and blocking, averting the adoption of Draft Law #11115, potentially liable for harming Internet freedoms. A number of important soft law recommendations advising on media content production were published and endorsed by the authorities this month.

July was marked by the renewal of discussions on platform regulation among Ukraine’s legislative and executive bodies. While they haven’t yet resulted in any changes in the laws, Verkhovna Rada passed three other drafts influencing media freedom and journalists’ rights in the first reading. The media regulator has also been actively working to protect information space by blacklisting new services and people affiliated with Russian propaganda for war.

In June, Ukraine got closer to its European future after the official announcement of the opening of the EU accession negotiations. While there were no tectonic changes of a similar type in the national legal system during this month, the MPs voted for some important pieces of legislation. Read more about the most notable events of this period in the latest issue of our digest.

May has been a turbulent month for the Ukrainian media environment. With “temnyky” returning to Ukrinform and Suspilne leaving the United Marathon, many commentators started questioning whether Ukraine is returning to the times of censoring independent media. However, some progress in implementing the Law on Media was nonetheless achieved. Read more in the May issue of our media regulation digest.

After an eventful start of the spring, in April, Ukrainian legislators mostly engaged in the discussions surrounding the new mobilisation law, and media-related issues had not been priority ones. Thus, this digest will be a relatively short one, depicting the rare initiatives and activities happening exactly one year after the Law on Media’s entry into force. Read about the most notable events happening during this period.

This is the latest issue of our monthly digest on media and digital rights regulation in Ukraine. March 2024 had it all: from draft laws to important decisions by the regulator, as well as international events shaping the regulatory environment for years to come.

February 2024 led to a push for making municipalities more transparent but was also marred by some initiatives that, if adopted, might be harmful to freedom of expression and privacy. Read more in our latest digest on media and digital rights regulation in Ukraine.

Recommendations for the responsible use of AI in the media, new language quotas coming into force, and digitalisation of relations between the media regulator and the media are the key highlights of January 2024. Read more in our latest digest on media and digital rights regulation in Ukraine.